Posts Tagged ‘Veterans’

Veterans For Peace President, Mike Ferner, Responds To President Obama’s Rebranded Occupation Of Iraq

War Is A Crime .org

A veteran’s perspective makes it clear that two major points must be made in response to President Obama’s announcement regarding combat troops leaving Iraq.

First, there is no such thing as “non combat troops.” It is a contradiction in terms. It is internally inconsistent. It is illogical. It is simply not true.

Ask any of the millions of men and women who went through basic training and they can tell you that every U.S. troop anywhere in the world was indoctrinated and trained in the basics of combat. While in Iraq, the transition from mechanics or communications back to combat-ready soldier takes but an order. “Non-combat troops” is simply the latest in a long line of military euphemisms meant to obscure painful reality.

The second point can best be made by drafting a section of the President’s remarks for him. If Veterans For Peace were to do that it would read something like this.

——-

“And now, fellow Americans, let us begin a new era of candor and honesty about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Specifically, I’m referring to the true costs of war – something that must be considered if we are to judge if continued war is worth it.

You have seen that the cost to taxpayers of these wars has exceeded one trillion dollars, nearly all of which has been considered ‘off budget,’ appropriated by extraordinary or ‘supplemental’ spending bills. It may be hard to believe, but large though that figure may be, it is only the smaller portion of what we will spend in total.

We are already investing unprecedented amounts in Veterans Administration staff and facilities to try and cope with the millions of men and women who have cycled through a war zone deployment – and of course many have been through multiple deployments.

Our experience thus far tells us to expect literally hundreds of thousands of cases of PTSD and Traumatic Brain Injuries – injuries that are often difficult to diagnose at first and difficult to treat. These are, of course, in addition to the many thousands of visibly wounded who, at great expense, must go through rehabilitation and a lifetime of support in order to function to their fullest. Thousands more will require years, perhaps decades, of long-term care because their injuries have left them so broken they require round-the-clock attention.

But since we are initiating an era of candor, we go farther – and by that I mean the cost to families, communities and society as a whole. Volumes have literally been written on this point, but let me leave you with a brief example you can easily expand for yourself.

We have already heard of the abnormally high rate of suicides among returning veterans. The real number is undoubtedly higher since some will always remain a mystery. We’ve heard also of a growing tide of domestic violence that leaves families broken and terrorized.

Beyond the draining medical, psychological and emotional costs to the individuals directly involved, imagine the cost to the communities where this occurs: whole battalions of police, fire, EMT, courts, probation officers, social workers and sadly, prison guards will be needed to deal with the true costs of war. It is uncomfortable to admit, but this is indeed one area of the economy I can guarantee will grow significantly.

Then there is an exponentially greater cost borne by the people of Iraq and Afghanistan – greater in every way: emotionally, economically, in human suffering, in destroyed opportunities, in shattered lives and minds, in hearts that will remain forever broken. We can do precious little to repair much of that kind of damage. But I can tell you this, my fellow Americans, we must at least pay the bill to rebuild the roads, water and sewer plants, hospitals, schools and residences we have destroyed.

It is not pleasant to describe such things and indeed, these costs will continue to weigh heavily on our nation well into our grandchildren’s generation. But we cannot pretend otherwise.”

This is the message that should come from the White House tonight if truth were indeed the coin of the realm. We won’t hear it, but that will make it no less true.

TAXES

thinkprogress.org

Getting What We Pay For: On Wednesday, April 15, conservative organizations casted “tea party” gatherings as “anti-tax rallies” that were “part of a larger grassroots movement against government spending.” Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News and Fox Business Network prodigiously promoted the gatherings, as essentially every right-wing organization — Dick Armey’s FreedomWorks, Newt Gingrich’s American Solutions for Winning the Future, Koch Industries’ Americans for Prosperity, the Heritage Foundation, American Spectator, the National Republican Congressional Committee, the Republican National Committee, and dozens of others — spent heavily to organize and mobilize the protests. In the end, thousands of Americans did turn out for the protests and for the live shows with popular Fox News celebrities and dozens of Republican politicians. The “tea party” campaign successfully drove mainstream media coverage in print and on television, providing the illusion of widespread opposition to the federal government and President Obama’s fiscal agenda. In reality, Americans are increasingly optimistic about the direction the nation is heading. As Obama’s economic recovery and budget plans have begun to go into effect — including the Making Work Pay tax cut for low- to middle-income working families — Americans’ views of income taxes are among the most positive in fifty years. “There’s obviously nothing wrong with the right attempting to engage in protest politics,” liberal blogger Duncan Black opines. “The problem is that it was never clear what they were protesting. So far, Obama has cut taxes for most of the population and…well, that’s it.”



CONSERVATIVE RAGE: Even as “the recession and the election of the nation’s first African-American president” fuel a resurgence in “right-wing extremism,” according to a new Department of Homeland Security report, conservative media used the Tea Party events to fan the flames of anger against government and Obama. ”They want failure!” Rush Limbaugh said of tea party participants. “Of course they want him to fail!” he said. Tea party protesters carried signs with racist and violent messages and accused the federal government of heading “toward fascism” and “toward socialism” — anti-government rhetoric promoted by Fox News’ Glenn Beck. CNBC’s Rick Santelli, whose on-air meltdown against poor homeowners in February helped spur the tea party campaign, argued that “this tea party phenomenon is steeped in American culture.” The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart put this minority rage into context, telling conservatives, “I think you might be confusing tyranny with losing.”

CONSERVATIVE TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY: “It’s astroturf by some of the wealthiest people in America to keep the focus on tax cuts for the rich instead of for the great middle class,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said recently when explaining the tea party campaign. As the Congressional Budget Office found in 2007, families “earning more than $1 million a year saw their federal tax rates drop more sharply than any group in the country as a result of President Bush’s tax cuts.” The Bush tax cuts for the wealthy are greater than the entire salary of most Americans. “When the tax cuts of recent years are fully in effect next year,” an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) found, “households with annual incomes of more than $1 million a year will receive tax cuts averaging $168,000, boosting their after-tax incomes by an average of 7.7 percent.” A new Gallup poll has found that “just 23 percent” of Americans believe that upper-income taxpayers pay their “fair share,” while 60 percent say they pay too little. Nevertheless, Republican leaders continue to push a fiscal agenda that includes revoking the stimulus and cutting taxes on the wealthiest Americans even more. They propose lowering the 35 percent, 33 percent, and 28 percent income tax brackets to 25 percent, which the Progress Report’s Pat Garofalo notes “are hugely regressive cuts that would gut government revenue.”

WHAT TAXES PAY FOR: An honest discussion of fiscal policy begins with an understanding of not only who is paying the taxes, but also where the revenues go. As the CBPP explains, military spending, Social Security, and federal health insurance programs (Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program), each comprise about 20 percent of the federal budget: $625 billion for defense and international security, including the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, $617 billion for Social Security for 35 million retirees, and $599 billion to the health insurance programs. Medicare alone “provides health coverage to around 45 million people who are over the age of 65 or have disabilities.” At 11 percent of the 2008 budget, the next largest component are safety net programs “that provide aid (other than health insurance or Social Security benefits) to individuals and families facing hardship,” such as unemployment benefits and food assistance. All other government programs — including veterans benefits, medical research, infrastructure, education, agriculture, and thousands of other efforts — fall in the remaining fifth of the budget. This is why responsible fiscal reform tackles big-ticket items: ending the war in Iraq, ending Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, reforming health care, and “closing the carbon loophole” in our energy policy. Ending the status quo of increased dependence on the military-industrial complex, the inefficient health care industry, and a dangerously polluting fossil-fuel energy system will not only restore balance to the federal budget but rebuild the American economy.

head-utrlight2.gif

RADICAL RIGHT — BACHMANN CLAIMS THAT THE SIX MUSLIM LEADERS DETAINED IN MN IN 2006 WERE ATTENDING ELLISON’S VICTORY PARTY: Last week KSGO 560 AM San Francisco conducted a little noticed radio interview with Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) in which the host, Lee Rogers, took issue with the fact that the voters of Minnesota were the first to elect “an openly, avowed Muslim to Congress,” Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN). Rogers asked for Bachmann’s reaction to the fact that Ellison helped President Obama find qualified American Muslims to serve in his administration. Bachmann blamed the “very liberal new media” in Minnesota for suppressing news of Ellison’s efforts. Later, Rogers asked Bachmann about a 2006 incident in which “[s]ix Muslim religious leaders were taken off a US Airways flight in Minneapolis…and detained for several hours after some passengers and crew members complained of behavior they deemed suspicious.” As the blog DumpBachmann first noted, Bachmann falsely replied that the religious leaders were in Minneapolis to attend “Congressman Keith Ellison’s victory celebration, when he won as a member of Congress.” In fact, the six were not attending Ellison’s victory celebration. As the New York Times reported after the incident, they were on their way back from a “Minneapolis conference of the North American Imams Federation.” Further, there is no evidence in any news reports that the six religious leaders fit the “pattern” of the 9/11 hijackers or that they were “shouting” anti-Bush or anti-American phrases, as Bachmann also claimed in the interview. The group was detained because other passengers on their flight were suspicious because the group was speaking in Arabic to one another and had prayed in the terminal prior to boarding. After five hours of detention and interviews, federal agents released the group finding them not to be a threat.

HUMAN RIGHTS — AFGHAN WOMEN PROTEST MARITAL RAPE LAW: Yesterday, 300 Afghan women marched two miles through Kabul to deliver a petition to Parliament calling for the repeal of a law that effectively legalizes marital rape. As,they shouted for “equal rights and human rights,” they were swarmed by 1000 counter-protesters. The counter-protesters, both male and female, shouted slurs, calling the women “dogs,” “whores,” and “slaves to the Christians.” The law was signed on March 31 by President Karzai as an attempt to mollify Islamic fundamentalists in advance of Afghanistan’s August elections. The law, which only applies to the Shia minority in Afghanistan, “negates the need for sexual consent between married couples, tacitly approves child marriage and restricts a woman’s right to leave the home.” President Obama called this law “abhorrent” and Secretary of State Clinton declared that women’s rights in Afghanistan are “not marginal.” After international outrage — including a suggestion from British Prime Minster Gordon Brown that the UK could withdraw its troops over the issue — Karzai began to back down. Earlier this month, he ordered a review of the law and yesterday a government spokesperson emphasized the the proposal was not yet law.

MILITARY — DEFENSE AND VETERANS DEPARTMENTS UNDER-DIAGNOSE TROOPS’ MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS: In an article published today in The New England Journal of Medicine, two Army mental health researchers — Cols. Charles Hoge and Carl Castro — say the Pentagon and Department of Veterans Affairs “are overemphasizing mild traumatic brain injury among combat troops at the expense of other medical problems that are going untreated.” Castro and Hoge say “the military should scrap screening questions meant to uncover cases of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) among troops returning from combat,” as “most troops who suffered a concussion in battle recovered within days of the injury.” Their article adds that symptoms blamed on TBI are more likely due to depression, PTSD, or substance abuse. Their article is the latest in a string of recent stories indicating that cases of PTSD are going largely unnoticed by the Pentagon. Last month, the Air Force Times reported that as many as 300,000 troops had PTSD but received inadequate care with only about half of all claims for the condition being approved. Just last week, Salon reported that, according to a secretly recorded audio tape, a psychologist told his soldier patient that many doctors are being pressured to not diagnose PTSD and diagnose anxiety disorders instead. Gen. Eric Schoomaker, the Army’s surgeon general, has been convinced by Casto’s and Hoge’s report and has said that the screening process should be changed.

A 21st Century Veterans Affairs

VETERANS 

A 21st Century Veterans Affairs

Yesterday, President-elect Barack Obama named ret. Army Gen. Eric Shinseki as his Secretary of Veterans Affairs (VA), promising “the kind of VA that will serve our veterans as well as they have served us.” Shinseki will face one of the country’s most daunting tasks: managing an institution already plagued by backlogs, scandals, and inadequate resources, and is increasingly taxed by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. During the press conference, Shinseki spoke directly to veterans: “If confirmed, I will work each and every day to ensure that we are serving you as well as you have served us. We will pursue a 21st-century VA that serves your needs.” The nomination of the first Asian-American to the post — Shinseki, a Japanese-American, grew up in Hawaii — carried extra poignancy coming on the 67th anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attacks. Military officials and some veterans organizations immediately praised Obama’s announcement. Former Secretary of State Gen. Colin Powell called Shinseki “an inspired selection.” “He is a man that has always put patriotism ahead of politics, and is held in high regard by veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan,” read a statement by the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America.

 Continue reading »

This Veterans Day, U.S. Soldiers Say ‘Stop the War’

By Benjamin Lewis and Brandon Neely, AlterNet. Posted November 11, 2008.

An open letter from war resisters calls for an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

On this day, Veteran’s Day, we would like to express to the American public why we, veterans of the Global War on Terror, have chosen to refuse orders to reactivate into military service. We are direct witnesses to the horrors of this war, having experienced its atrocities at their source, and we have decided that we can no longer carry out these illegal and immoral policies.

We believe that veterans and active-duty GIs are in a key position to stop illegal and unjust war, and we are inspired by the resistance of troops who stood against the war in Vietnam. One of the preeminent reasons for the U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam was increasing dissent among the active-duty troops stationed abroad and at home. By the end of the war, there were entire units refusing to participate in combat, many going as far as outright mutiny.

The United States learned a lesson from the Vietnam War: that it is unlikely, except in the event of self-defense, that regular civilians will execute the life-threatening orders that are given to them by military authority. The solution of policy makers was to create an all-volunteer force that negated the need for a draft. This translates into a mercenary force composed of America’s disadvantaged: a sector of the U.S. demographic that is particularly susceptible to military recruitment for lack of other options and finding themselves with deployment orders again and again. Continue reading »

Iraq, Afghanistan and the Treatment of Veterans — Voter Guide

AlterNet. Posted October 17, 2008.

See how the candidates compare on the occupation of Iraq, the use of mercenaries in war and other issues in the so-called War on Terror.

The current financial crisis, which experts are roundly describing as a calamity of unprecedented proportions, has convinced most voters that the economy is the most urgent priority of the incoming administration. The war on Iraq — and the broader existential conflict known for years now as the Global War on Terror — has taken a backseat in many voters’ minds. But the two are inextricably linked, and how the next president views the latter will largely dictate the way the government spends taxpayer dollars in the years to come.

“The Iraq adventure has seriously weakened the U.S. economy,” wrote economists Linda J. Bilmes and Joseph E. Stiglitz in the Washington Post on the fifth anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion. “… You can’t spend $3 trillion — yes, $3 trillion — on a failed war abroad and not feel the pain at home.” Regardless of the timetable, at this point, “the United States will be paying the price of Iraq for decades to come.”

And then, of course, there’s Afghanistan. In spite of their differences on when and how to leave Iraq, both John McCain and Barack Obama support an escalation of the war in Afghanistan, a conflict that, if history is any indication, is unwinnable. Continue reading »

McCain Lies Again, Repeats False Claim He ‘Received The Highest Honor And Awards’ From Every Vets Group

Think Progress

Yesterday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) held a telephone town hall meeting, in which “thousands” of Nevadans — according to the McCain campaign — called to listen in. Among some of the hostile, pointed, and critical questions came one from a veteran, who challenged McCain on his voting record regarding funding for the Veterans Administration and veterans’ priorities:

Q: I know you voted for lesser increases, and sometimes they were so much less, and our VA desperately needs the money. Can you tell me why you would vote for less money for the VA when there’s a war going on?

M: Well of course I have not and I’m afraid I’ve been endorsed by the VFW in every election that I’ve been in. I have been — received the honors, the highest honor and awards from all our veterans organizations for my consistent support of them. I don’t know what you’re looking at, but the DAV, the VFW, the American Legion, all of them have given me their highest awards for my consistent support of them.

As ThinkProgress has repeatedly documented, McCain is either willfully lying or he is delusional about his record — and the meaning of “highest awards.” In fact, McCain has recently stood on the opposite side of all three of the groups he mentioned:

Disabled American Veterans (DAV): In a list of 36 “key votes,” shows McCain “Voted Against Us” 16 times. (Obama “Voted With Us” 17 times, and against only once.)

Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW): Endorsed Sen. Jim Webb’s (D-VA) GI Bill that McCain vigorously opposed; called McCain’s alternative GI Bill “very partisan” and said they “didn’t have much input” in its crafting.

American Legion: Endorsed Webb’s GI Bill and criticized McCain’s concern about how it would affect retention, saying the bill “would encourage young men and women to join the military.” Continue reading »

Vets With ALS to Get VA Benefits

September 26, 2008
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

The Department of Veterans Affairs has published new regulations that designates amyotrophic lateral sclerosis — ALS — commonly called Lou Gehrig’s Disease, as a service-connected disease. The measure will provide full access to health and disability benefits to all veterans with ALS.

“Veterans are developing ALS in rates higher than the general population and it was appropriate to take action,” said James Peake, secretary of Veterans Affairs, in a news release. “ALS is a disease that progresses rapidly, once it is diagnosed. There simply isn’t time to develop the evidence needed to support compensation claims before many veterans become seriously ill.”

In 2001, the department opted to provide service-connected benefits to Gulf War veterans after multiple studies found returning veterans were being diagnosed almost twice as often as civilians.

In addition, the connection between military service in the Gulf and ALS was strengthened by the fact that the disease typically affects people in their 50s, and 98 percent of Gulf War veterans are less than age 45.

More recent scientific studies have shown that the higher rates of ALS in veterans involve more than just those who served in the Gulf War. Harvard researchers found that men with any history of military service in the last century are at a nearly 60 percent greater risk of being diagnosed with the disease.

It is unknown what causes ALS or how it can be prevented, effectively treated or cured. It is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that attacks nerve cells and pathways in the brain and spinal cord.

Veterans with ALS in race against time

Afflicted with Lou Gehrig’s disease, they fight for military benefits as science hunts the cause.

“The mind stays strong, but the body…” says Anthony Averella, 53, who served in the Army and National Guard and suffers from deadly Lou Gehrig’s disease. He has lost more than 50 pounds in the past year. (Sun photo by Chiaki Kawajiri / May 16, 2008 )

 

By Josh Mitchell | Sun reporter
josh.mitchell@baltsun.com
May 19, 2008

The first time he fell, Army Sgt. 1st Class Anthony Averella was strolling on a military base in Afghanistan. He got up, collected himself and brushed aside the concerns of fellow soldiers. Within months, Averella was stumbling regularly, and his hands began inexplicably clenching into fists.

At first, tests revealed nothing. Three years ago, the Maryland soldier found out what was afflicting him: Lou Gehrig’s disease.

Once an intense weightlifter, Averella is now bedridden at his Glen Burnie apartment, every part of him dying but his mind. He can barely move on his own and communicates by typing with one hand on a laptop computer. Continue reading »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.