Politics or Poppycock

A Look From the Left At Politics, Politicians, Policies and Issues of National Concern

Archive for June 11th, 2009

Bill Gates–Right On

Posted by James O'Rourke on June 11, 2009

It might help to post this in every room in every School, College  and University.  

HE GOT IT RIGHT


Love him or hate him, he sure hits the nail on the head with this!


Bill Gates recently gave a speech at a High School about 11 things they did not and will not learn in school. He talks about how feel-good, politically correct teachings created a generation of kids with no concept of reality and how this concept set them up for failure in the real world. 

Rule 1 : Life is not fair – get used to it! 

Rule 2 : The world doesn’t care about your 
self-esteem. The world will expect you to accomplish something BEFORE you feel good about yourself. 

Rule 3 : You will NOT make $60,000 a year right out of high school. You won’t be a vice-president with a car phone until you earn both. 

Rule 4 : If you think your teacher is tough, wait till you get a boss. 

Rule 5 : Flipping burgers is not beneath your dignity. Your Grandparents had a different word for burger flipping: they called it opportunity. 

Rule 6 : If you mess up, it’s not your parents’ fault , so don’t whine about your mistakes, learn from them. 

Rule 7 : Before you were born, your parents weren’t as boring as they are now. They got that way from paying your bills, cleaning your clothes and listening to you talk about how cool you thought you were. So before you save the rain forest from the parasites of your parent’s generation, try delousing the closet in your own room. 

Rule 8 : Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life HAS NOT. In some schools, they have abolished failing grades and they’ll give you as MANY TIMES as you want to get the right answer. This doesn’t bear the slightest resemblance to ANYTHING in real life. 

Rule 9 : Life is not divided into semesters. You don’t get summers off and very few employers are interested in helping you FIND YOURSELF. Do that on your own time. 

Rule 10 : Television is NOT real life. In real life people actually have to leave the coffee shop and go to jobs. 

Rule 11 : Be nice to nerds. Chances are you’ll end up working for one. 
 
If you agree, pass it on. 
If you don’t agree stick your head in the sand and take a deep breath!
If you can read this -Thank a teacher!

Posted in Issues | Leave a Comment »

From Wall Street to Wisconsin to Health Care For All

Posted by James O'Rourke on June 11, 2009

logo_caf2.gif
1px_trans11.gif
Does the road to health care reform run through Wisconsin? Could the shape of health reform to come be based on a Wall Street model? Maybe, if you believe the reports that the health care reform outline circulating on the hill includes a scheme for a health insurance exchange. CNN’s Money & Main St.: “What’s the point of an exchange? Well, it would set some ground rules for how insurance is bought and sold, just as there are rules for how stocks are traded in the market. For example, insurers wouldn’t be allowed to sell policies that exclude pre-existing conditions. Individuals could choose between a newly formed public health insurance option and private plans, encouraging competition among insurers. Furthermore, the exchange would make it easier for consumers to comparison-shop policies.”; Congress may be borrowing from Wall Street, but Obama is taking a closer look at Green Bay, Wisconsin. Washington Post: “What Obama is likely to hear in Green Bay is testimony to the value of digital records, physician collaboration, preventive care and transparency, say those most involved in Wisconsin’s innovative approach.”; Aside from the relatively new “health insurance exchange” idea, the somewhat older idea of tampering with tax-free health benefits is still in the mix as Congress comes up with a recipe for health reform. USAToday; History does indeed repeat itself. The American Medical Association is reprising its role on the ongoing saga of health reform (which dates back as far as Teddy Roosevelt and Progressive Party), by announcing its opposition (again) to a public health insurance plan. NY Times; While committed to the goal of affordable health insurance for all, the association had said in a general statement of principles that health services should be “provided through private markets, as they are currently.” It is now reacting, for the first time, to specific legislative proposals being drafted by Congress.”; Talk about transformational. Doctors and insurance companies are now on the same side; The NY Times’ Nicholas Kristof recounts a Canadian woman’s health care story, remembers the past and declares “This time, we won’t scare.”

Posted in Issues | Leave a Comment »

The Very Real Threat Of Extremism

Posted by James O'Rourke on June 11, 2009

RADICAL RIGHT

The Very Real Threat Of Extremism

Yesterday’s tragic shooting at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, DC, by an ”88-year-old white supremacist,” is the latest in a string of right-wing extremist attacks. The number of hate groups such as the “Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, racist skinheads and Black separatists” operating in the United States is at an all-time high, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Moreover, gun purchases since President Obama’s election surged. However, when the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) declassified a report “detailing potential increases in right-wing extremism” in April, right-wing commentators and Republican politicians decried the report as a politically motivated attack on all conservatives. They claimed that “the Obama administration is targeting conservatives and others simply because they disagree with administration policies and proposals.” Ignoring that the report — like a similar one describing the threat of left-wing extremists — was commissioned by the Bush administration, conservatives called for the resignation of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. Media Matters Action Fund’s Matt Finkelstein asks, “Will Republicans admit that their partisan ‘outrage’ was misplaced?”

A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE: The declassified DHS report warned, “Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely.” The report further warned, “The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.” This description reflected recent extremist violence, including the July 2008 shooting spree in a Knoxville church ”because of its liberal teachings,” a thwarted attempt to assassinate Obama in October by two neo-Nazi skinheads, and “a racially motivated rape and murder spree in Brockton, MA” by a 22-year-old white supremacist the “day after Barack Obama was inaugurated.” Since the report was issued last April, the trail of death has continued. “We have seen not only the murder of an abortion physician by a member of the radical right, but the murders of five law enforcement officers — three police officers in Pittsburgh, two sheriff’s deputies in Florida by radical right-wing extremists,” SPLC’s Mark Potok told CNN. “It’s really been quite an extraordinary period.” The Pittsburgh shooter “feared the Obama administration was poised to ban guns,” and the Florida killer was “severely disturbed that Barack Obama had been elected President.” In an incident earlier this month, a “lone wolf” American Muslim extremist “shot and killed Army Pvt. William Long” outside a Little Rock, AR, mall in anger over the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

CONSERVATIVES VS. EXTREMISTS: Conservative politicians led the attack on the DHS report. Both House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) called it “offensive.” Others went further: Gun advocate Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) claimed “the report has no intelligence value and only serves to blur our constitutional protections, such as the Second Amendment,” and Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) argued that “it looks like the extremists are those running the DHS.” “What is the Department of Homeland Security calling us now?” Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) asked at an April 15 tea party protest. “Extremists? Well, give me a button.” “Now if you disagree with that liberal path that President Obama’s taken the country down,” Fox News’ Sean Hannity claimed, “you may soon catch the attention of the Department of Homeland Security.” Texas Rep. John Carter (R-TX), after demanding Napolitano’s firing on the House floor, told Politico, “Singling out political opponents for working against the ruling party is precisely the tactic of every tyrannical government from Red China to Venezuela.” As Mother Jones’s James Ridgeway observed, ”Conservatives haven’t been branded dangerous extremists by DHS or the Obama administration; they’ve branded themselves.”

‘WARNING US FOR A REASON’: Following the Holocaust Museum shooting, two Fox News personalities, Shepard Smith and Catherine Herridge, suggested that critics of DHS’s report on right-wing extremism should re-think their objections. “The right went absolutely bonkers” over the report, said Smith, adding that DHS was “warning us for a reason.” Though some conservatives have concluded that the recent string of right-wing violence has “vindicated” the DHS report, many others disagree. Blogger and Fox News contributor Michelle Malkin, who led the charge against the DHS report, approvingly linked to a military blogger that called Smith and Herridge “pathetic.” Malkin’s Hot Air colleague, Ed Morrissey, defended the criticism of the report by claiming that it didn’t “mention anti-semitism at all.” But as Huffington Post’s Sam Stein points out, the DHS report “warned specifically about an upswing of anti-Semitic behavior.” “At this point it’s little consolation,” CBS News’s Charles Cooper observes, “but Department of Homeland Security head Janet Napolitano turned out to be more prescient about domestic extremism than many of her critics.”

Posted in Politics | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Spelling Out Health Reform

Posted by James O'Rourke on June 11, 2009

logo_caf1.gif

Forbes reports that the health care reform debate is heating up, and reaching the point where people “stop being polite and start being real.” Or “tweeting real”. With a letter to Senators Kennedy and Baucus, President Obama spelled out his positions on health care reform, and ended up with another Senator firing potshots from Twitter; The AP reports Sen. Kennedy is handing off health care reform to Sen. Dodd, to handle in his absence as he battles cancer; Meanwhile, Senate Democrats have unveiled their healthcare bill, but there are details left to be worked out and the House Democrats’ bill to reconcile with. And so the sausage-making begins. Reuters: Leading Senate Democrats unveiled on Tuesday a plan to reshape U.S. healthcare that calls for sweeping insurance market reforms and prohibits insurers from denying coverage or charging more due to medical history… In a bow to Republican concerns, Kennedy’s committee bill leaves open the details of how such a plan would operate. Panel Democrats and Republicans are set to meet this week to try to work out differences over the public plan.”; Time says the House Democrats’ plan is more conservative than expected: “For all the uncertainty surrounding health-care reform, most observers thought they could count on at least one thing from Capitol Hill – that the proposals coming out of the House of Representatives would be bolder and more liberal than those from the more moderate Senate. But as the first details of the actual bills begin to surface, that’s no longer so clear. On Tuesday, the same day that the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee released some of its bill’s language, the first outlines of the bill being drafted by the three key committee chairmen in the House – Energy and Commerce’s Henry Waxman, Ways and Means’ Charles Rangel and Education and Labor’s George Miller – showed that while the two chambers are going along generally parallel tracks, it may well be the House that is taking the more cautious approach, at least for the moment.”; That important details are still unresolved suggests that lawmakers are still unsure how to navigate the tricky terrain between here and there, “there” being health care reform that covers everyone. Washington Post; That terrain is made tricky by what Slate’s Timothy Noah describes as “the paradox of health reform”: “Polls tend to show that while a significant majority of Americans favors a more aggressive role for government in controlling health care costs and extending coverage to the uninsured, a majority simultaneously pronounces itself satisfied with its own health insurance, which typically is provided by employers. A March poll conducted by CNN found an overwhelming majority (77 percent to 23 percent) dissatisfied with the health care costs borne by the country as a whole, but also found a narrow majority (52 percent to 48 percent) satisfied with the total cost of its own health care. It’s a baffling but not unusual discrepancy. As journalist David Whitman noted in his 1998 book The Optimism Gap, Americans tend to take an unrealistically sunny view of their own circumstances compared with those of other people. (A familiar illustration is the way the public consistently condemns Congress yet re-elects congressional incumbents year after year. Congress may be terrible, but my representative is the greatest!)”; Just to make it interesting, Blue Dog Democrats could be a major influence in shaping health care reform. McClatchy; Not that everyone thinks health reform is a good idea. Ezra Klein picks apart the WSJ’s long, strange case against health care reform: “It’s a bit hard to know where to start with the Wall Street Journal’s long argument against health care reform. Our health care system, they argue, is worth the money we pay for it. It is a dazzling achievement, ensuring not only longer lives, but better lives. The problem with the Obama administration’s health care plans? They want to extend those benefits to those who can’t currently afford them.”

Posted in *Healthcare Issues, Issues | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Health Care Reform Debate Starting to Take Shape

Posted by James O'Rourke on June 11, 2009

This Week in Congress

Your Headlines, Your Issues, Your Opinions

June 08, 2009

After months of talk, legislation reforming the nation’s health care system is beginning to emerge in Congress. What’s apparent is that one of the major sticking points as Congress begins to debate reform plans is whether to create a public health insurance system, similar to Medicare, that competes with private insurers.

The advantage to a public plan is that it all but guarantees health insurance coverage to every American. The drawback is that its cost is unknown at the moment, and critics say it’s a step toward a government-run health care system. Possibilities for financing a public option include forcing employers to pay into a fund for public insurance, taxing workers’ health care benefits as income and changing tax laws to make it more difficult for the wealthy to write off charitable contributions.

President Barack Obama and most Congressional Democrats favor creating a public insurance plan. Many Republicans are opposed.

Should Americans be guaranteed health care coverage through a government-run, taxpayer-financed program?

Tell Obama and your Senators what you think by taking our poll.

Posted in *Healthcare Issues, Politics | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »